Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2014
Publication Title
RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas
First Page
254
Last Page
267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020140302
Additional Publication URL
https://www.scielo.br/j/rae/a/qVxrzHKym6rHRGMPMsXgTXN/?lang=pt&format=pdf
Abstract
This study aims to rescue the discussion of science fragmentation, exploring how this phenomenon manifests itself in Management Science and Business Administration and what its implications for the advancement of scientific knowledge. As an illustrative case, we used the interface between Operations Management and Human Resources Management fields. The methodology adopted was a bibliometric research through a structured mapping of the scientific production of these two major areas. The results indicated that both evolved independently, with little synergy, given the paucity of works found in two decades of research. The study highlights some factors that can enhance the fragmentation: epistemological views, preferences, and methodological gaps between the authors. From these findings, the study seeks to provoke reflection about the opportunities offered from the exchange between areas for the advancement of knowledge.
Rights
Originally published by FGV´s Sao Paulo School of Business Administration (EAESP) under a Creative Commons 4.0 in RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 2017, Volume 54, Issue 2, 254 - 67. DOI: 110.12660/joscmv11n1p94-96.
Recommended Citation
Siegler, Jane; Biazzin, Cristiane; and Rodrigues Fernandes, Aline, "Fragmentação do conhecimento científico em administração: uma análise crítica" (2014). Scholarship and Professional Work - Business. 307.
https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/cob_papers/307