Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
2019
Publication Title
Pacifism, Politics, and Feminism: Intersections and Innovations
First Page
117
Last Page
136
Abstract
Should the U.N. Security Council (unsc) use its coercive powers to bring about effective climate change mitigation? This question remains relevant considering the inadequate mitigation goals set by the signatories of the Paris Climate Accord and the ramifications of U.S. withdrawal from the Accord. This paper argues that the option of the unsc coercing climate change mitigation through military action, or the threat thereof, is morally flawed and ultimately antithetical to effectively addressing climate change. This assessment is based significantly on the application of jus ad bellum principles of just war theory, incorporating some feminist critiques of this theory.
Rights
This is a post-print version of the chapter, Climate Change Mitigation and the U.N. Security Council: A Just War Analysis, in Pacifism, Politics, and Feminism: Intersections and Innovations all rights reserved. Version of record available through: Kling, Jennifer. (eds.). (2019). Pacifism, Politics, and Feminism: Intersections and Innovations . Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Rodopi. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004396722
Recommended Citation
van der Linden, Harry, "Climate Change Mitigation and the U.N. Security Council: A Just War Analysis" Pacifism, Politics, and Feminism: Intersections and Innovations / (2019): 117-136.
Available at https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers/1071